Finns who can't be fired show debt trap at work

Finns who can't be fired show debt trap at work

Finland is a nice place to be if you work in the public sect...

Emotional alchemy for all

Emotional alchemy for all

"Vesa's art is amongst the most integrally advanced in the h...

Low-income people's Christmas gift wishes for children: Shampoo and soap

Low-income people's Christmas gift wishes for children: Shampoo and soap

Heidi Miettinen knows that not all Finnish families can affo...

Bank of Finland expects recession to drag on

Bank of Finland expects recession to drag on

Deficit in public finances to remain considerable and public...

70 employees face the axe at Seppälä

70 employees face the axe at Seppälä

Stockmann has completed negotiations with the staff of Seppä...

SDP and NCP neck and neck in new poll

SDP and NCP neck and neck in new poll

The Social Democratic Party has pulled 0.2 percentage points...

  • Most Read

Legal experts deem many driving bans illegal

The severity of a speeding offence invariably also depends on the road conditions, reminds senior officer Timo Jaakkola.

Professors of criminal and procedural law estimate that the imposition of a driving ban in addition to a speeding fine infringes the European Convention on Human Rights and, in particular, the right not to be punished twice for the same offence – a key principle of international criminal law.

The Supreme Administrative Court of Finland ruled in 2012 that if a motorist has been found guilty of three speeding offences within one year, the driving ban imposed in the consequent administrative procedure does not constitute a second punishment for the same offence.

The minimum duration of such a driving ban is one month and the maximum five years, depending on the degree of the violation.

“The interpretation adopted in Finland that [a driving ban] is only a preventive measure is dubious and problematic. Driving bans are comparable to criminal sanctions, when you take into consideration the effective severity of the driving ban for the suspect,” argues Sakari Melander, an assistant professor of criminal law at the University of Helsinki.

A preventive measure is a measure enforced by an administrative authority limiting the rights or freedoms of a suspect for the protection of public interests.

“The driving ban procedure is at the very least problematic and can't be justified as a preventive measure. Three speeding violations within one year could be the grounds for a stiffer punishment but not for a new punishment enforced in an administrative procedure,” says Jussi Tapani, a professor of criminal law at the University of Turku.

The problem, he underlines, could be addressed by imposing the fine or prison sentence and driving ban in the same legal proceedings. Thereby, it would also be possible to weigh up the severity of the punishment as a whole.

Melander agrees, viewing that the severity of the entire punishment should be taken into consideration also in the case of a serious traffic violation.

If a motorist is convicted of two counts of causing a serious traffic hazard within five years, a driving ban of a minimum of one year will be imposed in addition to a fine or prison sentence. “If you live in a remote area, a driving ban of a minimum of one year can complicate your life notably,” Melander points out.

Petri Sajari – HS
Aleksi Teivainen – HT
© HELSINGIN SANOMAT
Photo: Rio Gandara / HS

Helsinki Times Information

Editor-in-chief Alexis Kouros Tel: +358 9 689 67 425

Editorial team

James O’Sullivan, David Cord, Yannick Ilunga, Alicia Jensen, Merle Must, Andy Kruse, Eva Czechanowski, Anna-Maija Lappi, Annika Rautakoura, Mari Storpellinen, Aleksi Teivainen 

Email: info(a)helsinkitimes.fi

Web & Online subscription

Mahmoud Assiabi
webmaster(a)helsinkitimes.fi

 
Sales and marketing

Bob Graham
Aiman Kaddoura
Ethan Shadabi
Andre Roots

Email addresses are
Firstname(a)helsinkitimes.fi

Publisher
Helsinki Times Oy
Vilhonvuorenkatu 11 B
00500 Helsinki
Finland